Worst Crypto Rug Pulls That Ever Happened

Crypto rug pulls have shocked investors worldwide. From fake tokens to vanished liquidity, these worst crypto rug pulls reveal how scams drain millions. Have you ever wondered which ones made the biggest headlines?

As digital asset markets continue to surge in popularity and attract waves of new investors, the threat of crypto rug pulls has never been more substantial or sophisticated. Crypto scam detection, avoiding crypto rug pulls, and identifying cryptocurrency scams are now essential skills for anyone navigating the fast-paced world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and blockchain investing. History is rife with devastating cases of schemes like the OneCoin Ponzi, BitConnect’s collapse, the FTX bankruptcy, Thodex’s centralized exit scam, and the notorious Squid Game token exit, collectively costing unsuspecting participants billions of dollars.

The sheer scale of these losses, from swift liquidity drains to long-term project abandonments, underscores the urgent need to scrutinize projects for tokenomics red flags in crypto, such as anonymous development teams, unfair token distributions, or unaudited smart contracts. Understanding the deceptive tactics employed from fake hype and influencer marketing to manipulative technical design has become crucial not only for financial protection but also for promoting a safer and more trustworthy blockchain ecosystem.

In this article, we provide a compelling overview of the most shocking rug pulls ever recorded in cryptocurrency history. Readers will be introduced to the defining characteristics of rug pulls, a timeline of their evolution, and detailed case studies on high-profile scams. We will dissect the financial impact, the red flags that could have been spotted early, and the lessons learned for all participants in the digital asset space. Whether you are a crypto newcomer or an experienced investor, this guide delivers vital knowledge on recognizing risk factors, leveraging reliable crypto scam detection tools, and adopting smarter strategies to avoid becoming the next victim of a major crypto collapse.

Get more knowledge on how to avoid crypto scams:

eBook: Practical Strategies to Identify Crypto Scams

Related Posts:

How to Spot a Crypto Scam: Common Red Flags

Surge in Crypto Scam Cases

Common Crypto Scams and How to Avoid Them

Definition and Overview of Crypto Rug Pulls

At its core, a crypto rug pull is a type of scam where developers of a cryptocurrency project abruptly withdraw liquidity or abandon the project entirely, leaving investors holding worthless tokens and suffering massive financial losses. The term “rug pull” aptly describes the experience: the support is yanked away without warning, and investors are left exposed and often devastated.

Rug pulls occur most frequently within decentralized finance (DeFi) environments, where token creators or contract owners retain significant control over liquidity pools or smart contract functions. The core methods are:

• Liquidity Pulls: Developers remove the project’s liquidity from decentralized exchanges (DEXs) such as Uniswap or PancakeSwap, instantly collapsing the token price and making it unsellable for ordinary users.
• Pump-and-Dump: Insiders or developers artificially inflate a token’s value through coordinated hype, only to crash the market by dumping large holdings.
• Fake Project Exit Scams: Projects that never had genuine utility or development plans disappear soon after raising significant funds from investors.
• Honeypots and Hard Rug Pulls: Malicious smart contracts allow buys but block sales, or developers mint unlimited supply, trapping unsuspecting buyers.
• Soft Rug Pulls: Developers gradually abandon a project or slowly sell their holdings, causing a steady price decline without explicit technical fraud.

The fundamental features of blockchain, such as pseudo-anonymity, irreversibility of transactions, and lack of centralized oversight, make it exceptionally difficult to track scammers or recover stolen assets. Once funds have left an investor’s wallet in a rug pull scheme, recovery is practically impossible.

Timeline and Evolution of Rug Pulls in Crypto History

Crypto rug pulls are not new, but their methods and scale have evolved considerably since the first wave of notable cases. Early scams were often straightforward Ponzi schemes, using multi-level marketing (MLM) tactics and targeting non-technical investors. Due to crypto’s rapid innovation and lack of mature regulation, modern rug pulls have incorporated sophisticated smart contract exploits, flash loan attacks, insider trading, and AI-driven social media campaigns.

Key Developments:

• 2014–2017: Birth of massive Ponzi-style rug pulls, OneCoin and similar scams tap into ignorance about blockchain.
• 2016–2018: Rise of centralized exchange and lending collapses (BitConnect, PlusToken), blending traditional Ponzi structures with cryptocurrency mechanics.
• 2019–2021: DeFi’s explosion fuels a new breed of rug pulls, AnubisDAO, Meerkat Finance, and hundreds of liquidity scams on BSC and Ethereum.
• 2021: Meme tokens and pop culture integrations (e.g., Squid Game Token) prove fertile ground for fast-moving, high-profile rug pulls.
• 2022–2025: Centralized exchange failures (FTX), memecoin-driven scams, and highly technical DeFi exploitations (flash loans, contract upgrade backdoors) dominate the threat landscape. The scale of losses increases dramatically, with single incidents costing billions.

Notably, 2025 saw a staggering 6,500% increase in rug pull losses compared to the previous year, as chronicled by DappRadar, a reflection of scammers’ growing technical acumen and investors’ ongoing vulnerability.

Top Worst Crypto Rug Pulls in History

Below are some of the most notorious rug pulls that caused massive losses and shook confidence in DeFi.

OneCoin Ponzi Scheme

OneCoin stands out as arguably the largest crypto Ponzi scheme ever, running from 2014 to 2017 and defrauding investors of between $4 and $15 billion. Marketed by Ruja Ignatova, the self-styled “Cryptoqueen,” OneCoin promised a revolutionary blockchain-based cryptocurrency to rival Bitcoin. In reality, it operated as a centralized database with no blockchain and relied on MLM recruitment, selling overpriced “education packages” that included non-liquid tokens.

How did it work?

Ignatova and her co-conspirators conducted extravagant international events, used manipulative social media hype, and stoked FOMO by promising life-changing returns. Victims spanned the globe from small savers in Uganda who sold livestock for entry packages to professional networkers in Europe. Law enforcement in over a dozen countries issued warnings, but OneCoin’s rapid expansion evaded regulatory capture until Ignatova’s disappearance in 2017. Her brother, Konstantin Ignatov, and other key associates were arrested and convicted of fraud and money laundering; Ignatova remains at large and is on the FBI’s Most Wanted list.

Red Flags and Lessons:

• No real blockchain or public ledger; transaction records were internal and easily manipulated.
• Guaranteed returns and heavy reliance on MLM recruiting classic Ponzi structure.
• Fake “partnerships,” forged regulatory compliance, and plagiarized educational materials.
• Anonymous management, opaque operations, and the sudden disappearance of leadership.

OneCoin’s collapse severely damaged early crypto’s legitimacy and catalyzed a global push for better crypto scam detection and warning systems.

BitConnect Lending Program Collapse

BitConnect, launched in 2016, positioned itself as a decentralized lending platform promising daily profits through a proprietary “AI trading bot.” Its token (BCC) reached a top 10 crypto market cap, with prices peaking over $400. The reality was a classic Ponzi scheme: new investor funds were used to pay earlier “lenders,” and there was no evidence of any trading bot.

Aggressive influencer marketing and global events created a viral mania. Regulatory warnings from the US and UK in late 2017 preceded the collapse: BitConnect shuttered its exchange in early 2018, BCC’s price plummeted by over 90%, and billions were lost.

Key Deceptive Tactics:

• Guaranteed returns, sometimes promising up to 40% monthly without risk.
• Flashy, high-production conferences and viral marketing.
• Referral bonuses and high-pressure hype create a cult-like frenzy.
• Lack of transparency regarding bot operation or trading performance.

The meme-ification of BitConnect’s collapse and ensuing lawsuits turned it into a cautionary symbol for all subsequent crypto lending and “passive income” projects.

FTX Collapse and Misuse of Funds

FTX, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried in 2019, was once considered the gold standard for centralized exchanges with celebrity endorsements, regulatory overtures, and multibillion-dollar trading volumes. That trust crumbled overnight in November 2022. Investigations revealed that FTX had secretly transferred billions in customer deposits to its trading arm, Alameda Research, to cover risky bets lost in the Terra and Luna collapse and other ventures. The fallout was catastrophic: FTX filed for bankruptcy, over $8 billion in customer funds went missing, and its executives faced criminal convictions. Major failures included a lack of proof-of-reserves, private back channels for Alameda to maintain negative balances, and misleading statements about user fund safety. The collapse triggered a broader market panic, ripple bankruptcies, and renewed regulatory scrutiny worldwide.

What distinguished FTX?

• Apparent reputability and size lulled users into a false sense of security, a “too big to fail” belief.
• Lack of transparent, auditable reserves.
• Commingling of user funds, reckless management, and opaque corporate structure.
• No effective oversight or independent security audits of internal operations.

FTX demonstrated that even high-profile, seemingly-regulated platforms can harbor profound risks, highlighting the importance of crypto scam detection, exchange proof-of-reserves, and thorough due diligence.

Thodex Exchange Exit Scam

Thodex was a leading Turkish centralized exchange, operating from 2017 until April 2021, when it suddenly halted trading and locked out nearly 400,000 users. CEO Faruk Fatih Özer absconded with an estimated $2 billion in customer assets, triggering a nationwide scandal and an international manhunt. Özer was eventually captured in Albania and extradited to Turkey, where he received an 11,196-year prison sentence for aggravated fraud, money laundering, and criminal enterprise.

Contributing Factors:

• Lack of regulatory supervision and proof-of-reserves requirements for local exchanges.
• Unsustainable promotional campaigns and artificially high trading volumes.
• Centralized custody of assets without independent audits.
• Conflicting narratives (cyberattack explanations, claims of business reorganization, etc.) delayed user realization of the scam.

Thodex exemplifies the dangers faced by users on non-transparent, unregulated platforms, underscoring the necessity for crypto scam detection and proper exchange vetting.

Squid Game Token Rug Pull

In October 2021, the Squid Game Token (SQUID) capitalized on the viral popularity of Netflix’s hit series to promote a play-to-earn crypto project. The token skyrocketed from $0.01 to over $2,800 in a matter of days, driven by relentless social media hype and FOMO-induced speculation.

However, when investors attempted to sell their tokens, they discovered that the smart contract blocked any withdrawals except those made by the developers. The team swiftly drained the liquidity pool, deleted all online presence, and disappeared overnight, stealing more than $3.3 million. The entire episode unraveled within a week, leaving thousands of global investors with worthless tokens.

Key Deceptive Tactics:

• Anonymous development team with no prior crypto footprint or verifiable credentials.
• Smart contract coded with sell restrictions (honeypot design).
• Roadmap and whitepaper advertised “future developments” that never materialized.
• Outlandish, unverified claims and paid influencer marketing.
• No security audit; quick deletion of social platforms and web resources post-exit.

The Squid Game scam’s legacy was not just the financial devastation, but also the lesson that meme-driven viral hype, lack of technical scrutiny, and celebrity association can create the perfect breeding ground for devastating rug pulls.

Analysis of Financial Losses in Major Crypto Rug Pulls

The financial toll of major rug pulls is staggering. Year after year, rugged investors collectively lose tens of billions.

Major Losses Attributed to Infamous Rug Pulls

Project	Launch Year	Estimated Loss	Method
OneCoin	2014	$4–15 billion	Ponzi MLM, fake coin
BitConnect	2016	$2–2.5 billion	Ponzi lending, fake trading
Thodex	2017	$2 billion	Exchange exit (CEX)
FTX	2019	$8–11 billion	Custody fraud, fund misuse
Squid Game Token	2021	$3.3 million	Smart contract lock/rug pull
AnubisDAO	2021	$60 million	DeFi yield, contract rug
MetaYield Farm	2025	$290 million	Yield farming exit scam
Mantra	2025	$5.5 billion	Insider dump, DeFi rug
GainBitcoin	2014/2018	$3–12 billion	Ponzi, fake staking
WoToken	2018/2020	$1.1 billion	Ponzi, AI trading scam
PlusToken	2019	$2 billion	Wallet, MLM/Ponzi

The above table shows that while newer DeFi and meme token scams tend to steal millions, the classic centralized and MLM-driven Ponzi schemes (OneCoin, BitConnect, FTX) have resulted in historic, multibillion-dollar losses. Notably, the scale of recent DeFi protocol rug pulls has increased dramatically, with incidents like Mantra (2025) and MetaYield Farm leading a new era of “smarter, targeted hits” against crypto investors.

Common Deceptive Tactics in Crypto Rug Pulls Scam

Rug pulls are engineered with a complex web of psychological, technical, and social engineering tactics. Understanding their mechanics can help investors avoid falling victim.

1. Anonymous Teams or Fake Identities: Scammers routinely use unverifiable names, pseudonymous online personas, or “team” sections filled with stock photos. When no one stands to be held legally accountable, the risk for investors surges.

2. Hype-Driven Promotion and Influencer Endorsements: Many rug pulls rely on paid influencer marketing, meme virality, or celebrity endorsements to generate FOMO and a “trusted” illusion. Some celebrities have even promoted tokens without full disclosure or understanding of the project’s nature.

3. Unverified or Malicious Smart Contracts: Hard rug pulls often involve deploying smart contracts with admin backdoors, unlimited minting functions, or “honeypot” code that traps buyers by preventing sales. Auditing of contracts is often skipped or the audit is faked.

4. Instant or Unlocked Liquidity: Rug pullers often avoid locking liquidity on DEXs, allowing instant removal and devastating price crashes. Even “locked” liquidity can be faked via hidden admin keys or proxy contracts.

5. Unrealistic Promises and High-Yield Claims: Projects often offer staking or lending yields that defy logic APYs in the thousands, or “guaranteed” returns. These promises are used to attract unsophisticated retail investors20.

6. Sudden Team Disappearance or “Soft Exit”: Developers may slowly withdraw from activity, abandon social channels, or stop project communication, triggering a gradual price decline rather than a dramatic rug.

7. Vague or Plagiarized Whitepapers and Roadmaps: Minimal technical disclosure, or whitepapers that are plagiarized (as with OneCoin) or vague, signal a project more focused on raising funds than delivering real value.

8. Pump-and-Dump via Insider Wallets: Scammers often accumulate most of the token supply in a handful of wallets, then orchestrate market manipulation and dump their tokens onto unsuspecting latecomers.

9. Social Engineering and Phishing in Launches: Fake websites, lookalike wallets, and phishing attacks are sometimes an integral part of rug-pull schemes, especially during presale or token launch phases.

Tokenomics Red Flags in Crypto Projects

Tokenomics red flags in crypto refer to design features or supply-demand dynamics within a token’s structure that create an environment ripe for rug pulls and insider manipulation.

Key warning signs include:

• Excessive Team or Insider Allocations: If founders or core team wallets control more than 20% of supply or if wallets are unverified and opaque, the token is at high risk of a sudden dump or exit scam.
• Unlocked or Short-Lock Liquidity Pools: Unlocked liquidity can be withdrawn instantly, collapsing the token value. Locked liquidity is safer, especially when locked for a year or more.
• Mint Functions Not Disabled: The ability for developers to mint unlimited new tokens renders all prior tokens instantly worthless.
• No Smart Contract Audit: Without third-party review, malicious or buggy code may be hiding in plain sight.
• Admin Privileges Not Renounced: If deployers retain administrative rights, they can alter key contract functions at any time.
• No Whitepaper or Incomplete Documentation: Vagueness and lack of transparency about token distribution, utility, and project vision are critical risk indicators.
• Obfuscated Code or Proxy Contracts: Complex contract structures are often used to hide malicious functions or allow for future upgrades that can insert rug-pull functionality unnoticed.
• High Sales Taxes or Transaction Fees: Some projects introduce hidden, ultra-high (50–100%) transaction fees, making it impossible to sell without a massive loss.
• Community Botting and Fake Activity: Low engagement, suspiciously high follower counts, or bot-generated chats are marks of astroturfed “community” activity.

Smart investors use tools such as Token Sniffer, Slither, and on-chain explorers to analyze for these red flags before investing.

Techniques for Identifying Cryptocurrency Scams

As rug pull schemes become more intricate, identifying cryptocurrency scams before losing money is all about vigilance and leveraging the right resources.

• Research the Team: Look for verifiable links to LinkedIn, professional history, and past project outcomes. Anonymous or semi-anonymous teams are an instant red flag.
• Analyze Contract Security: Use tools like Token Sniffer, Slither, and Mythril to scan smart contract code for unlocked minting, sell restrictions, or other exploits.
• Track Liquidity Locks: Confirm liquidity is locked for an appropriate time using services like Unicrypt or Team Finance.
• Monitor Wallet Distribution: Check token holders on Etherscan or BscScan for excessive centralization. A few wallets holding the majority supply signal a risk of sudden dumping.
• Audit Social Media Engagement: Genuine engagement means more than follower count; look for consistent, organic discussions, transparent dev presence, and community Q&As.
• Watch for Over-Hyped Marketing: Overly aggressive, FOMO-driven campaigns, especially from previously unknown influencers, may indicate a paid shill operation.
• Review the Whitepaper Carefully: Look for clear, logical explanations of project purpose, tokenomics, and use case, not just buzzwords or broad promises.

Expert investors go further, simulating small test trades to detect high sell taxes or sell lockouts, monitoring GitHub activity for actual development, and remaining skeptical of any “moonshot” promises.

Strategies for Avoiding Crypto Rug Pulls

Recommended eBook to learn all the strategies on how to avoid crypto rug pulls. On Sale! Get it now at the most affordable price

eBook – Practical Strategies to Identify Crypto Scams

Avoiding rug pulls requires a proactive, skeptical, and systematic approach:

1. Do Your Own Research (DYOR): Never trust promotional hype or groupthink alone—dig into technical details, the team, and project history.
2. Use Audit and Scam Detection Tools: Always favor projects audited by credible third parties. Use on-chain scanners to check contract ownership, minting, fees, and code locks.
3. Favor Locked and Verifiable Liquidity: The vast majority of successful rugs happen where liquidity is either immediately accessible or “locked” with loopholes for removal.
4. Spread Your Risk: Avoid overexposing yourself to single projects, especially unproven DeFi or meme tokens.
5. Stick to Reputable Platforms: Large centralized exchanges with proof-of-reserves reports and regulated status are less likely to experience total exit scams. Decentralized exchanges are higher risk, but can be used more safely if contracts are carefully checked.
6. Trust, but Verify: False claims of celebrity or influencer involvement should always be checked via official channels.
7. Enable Wallet Security: Never share your private keys or wallet seeds, and store large sums in hardware wallets, not on exchanges or online wallets.
8. Set Loss Limits and Stick to Exits: Use stop-loss orders or rigid portfolio limits to avoid emotional decisions in volatile markets.
9. Keep Security Hygiene: Enable 2FA, update software, and avoid interacting with suspicious websites, airdrops, or DApps.

Above all, remember: if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Tools and Platforms for Crypto Scam Detection

The crypto ecosystem now boasts a suite of tools and services for scam detection:

Tool/Platform	Core Purpose	Notable Features
Token Sniffer	Contract risk scoring	Flags proxy contracts, backdoors, and owner controls
RugDoc	Project review and warnings	Human and automated code audits for DeFi tokens
De.Fi Scanner	Multi-chain contract audit	Flags proxy contracts, backdoors, owner controls
Quick Intel	On-chain analytics and alerts	Real-time wallet and contract monitoring
Chainalysis	Forensics and illicit tracking	Used by exchanges and law enforcement globally
Etherscan/BscScan	Explorer and wallet analyzer	Shows holder concentration, liquidity, and code
Honeypot.is	Honeypot/rug test via simulated buy/sell	Reveals non-sellable token traps
Slither, Mythril	Developer static/dynamic contract analysis	Find code vulnerabilities ahead of time
Immunefi	Bug bounty platform	Crowdsources white-hat hacking for live protocols
Scam Sniffer (browser ext)	Phishing and fake website block	Real-time DApp and site reputation protection

Many of these tools provide invaluable information for anyone participating in DeFi or altcoin launches. Major exchanges and institutional players rely on advanced versions (Chainalysis, CipherTrace) for large-scale transaction tracking and compliance.

Conclusion

The history of crypto rug pulls serves as a critical reminder for every investor in the digital asset space. From projects that disappeared overnight to fraudulent developers draining liquidity pools, these worst cryptocurrency scams highlight how devastating rug pulls can be for both beginners and seasoned traders. The lesson is clear: not every new project promising high returns or innovative technology can be trusted.

As the crypto market continues to grow, avoiding rug pulls requires consistent due diligence. Investors should always research tokenomics, check for transparent smart contracts, and evaluate the credibility of the development team before committing funds. Community feedback, liquidity lock confirmations, and project audits are additional steps that can help reduce risk.

While the worst crypto rug pulls in history have already cost billions, they also created awareness that fuels better security practices and smarter investing. Staying informed about crypto scam detection and learning how to identify early warning signs are essential skills for anyone exploring the world of digital assets.

Ultimately, the best defense is knowledge. By studying past rug pulls, investors can better protect themselves and ensure their journey in cryptocurrency remains profitable and secure.